医学信息学杂志

期刊简介

  原名《医学情报工作》。1979年创刊,内部刊物,季刊,48页;1992年改为公开发行,双月,64页;2006年更名为《医学信息学杂志》,大16开,108页;2007年改为月刊,96页。

  《医学信息学杂志》是国内创刊最早的医学信息方面的专业指导性刊物。自创刊之日起始终恪守理论与实践相结合,普及与提高相并重,倡导服务创新,推动事业发展的办刊宗旨。以报道医学信息领域的信息技术、信息研究、信息组织与利用等方面的理论方法、研究成果、技术应用等为主,形成了面向实践、注重新技术、追求新理论的特色,铸就了求实创新的学术风格,成为中国医学信息领域具有权威性与专业指导性的学术刊物。所载论文既反映了我国医学信息事业发展历程,又引领我国医学信息事业发展方向,为我国医学信息事业发展做出了重要贡献。


亚太热带医药杂志(英文版)征稿启事

时间:2023-08-11 10:34:00

68.jpg

Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine《亚太热带医学杂志(英文版)》(月刊),创刊于2008年,由海南医学院主办、国际著名出版集团Elsevier(爱思唯尔)出版、发行,是目前中国唯一一本全英文版的国际性热带医药期刊(月刊)。


Instructions to Authors

A manuscript will be reviewed for possible publication with the understanding that it is being submitted to Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine alone at that point in time and has not been published anywhere, simultaneously submitted, or already accepted for publication elsewhere. The journal expects that authors would authorize one of them to correspond with the Journal for all matters related to the manuscript. All manuscripts received are duly acknowledged. On submission, editors review all submitted manuscripts initially for suitability for formal review. Manuscripts with insufficient originality, serious scientific or technical flaws, or lack of a significant message are rejected before proceeding for formal peer-review. Manuscripts that are unlikely to be of interest to the Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine readers are also liable to be rejected at this stage itself.

Manuscripts that are found suitable for publication in Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine are sent to two or more expert reviewers. During submission, the contributor is requested to provide names of two or three qualified reviewers who have had experience in the subject of the submitted manuscript, but this is not mandatory. The reviewers should not be affiliated with the same institutes as the contributor/s. However, the selection of these reviewers is at the sole discretion of the editor. The journal follows a double-blind review process, wherein the reviewers and authors are unaware of each other’s identity. Every manuscript is also assigned to a member of the editorial team, who based on the comments from the reviewers takes a final decision on the manuscript. The comments and suggestions (acceptance/ rejection/ amendments in manuscript) received from reviewers are conveyed to the corresponding author. If required, the author is requested to provide a point by point response to reviewers’ comments and submit a revised version of the manuscript. This process is repeated till reviewers and editors are satisfied with the manuscript.

Manuscripts received from Editorial Board members will be screened by the Executive Editor-in-Chief and sent to external peer reviewers. The editorial board members who are authors will be excluded from publication decisions.

Manuscripts accepted for publication are copy edited for grammar, punctuation, print style, and format. Page proofs are sent to the corresponding author. The corresponding author is expected to return the corrected proofs within three days. It may not be possible to incorporate corrections received after that period. The whole process of submission of the manuscript to final decision and sending and receiving proofs is completed online. To achieve faster and greater dissemination of knowledge and information, the journal publishes articles online as ‘Ahead of Print’ immediately on acceptance.